Photos du mausolée de Imad Moughniyé

February 16, 2010
Leave a Comment


SNAP ANALYSIS-Rockets from Lebanon challenge Gaza offensive

January 8, 2009
Leave a Comment
]
JERUSALEM, Jan 8 (Reuters) – A rocket attack on northern Israel on Thursday appeared to be a response by Palestinian guerrillas in Lebanon to the Israeli offensive in the Gaza Strip, according to assessments on both sides of the frontier.
At least three rockets were fired, wounding two people. Israel struck back with what its army described as pinpoint artillery fire at the source of the attack — a limited military response that seemed to signal a desire to avoid escalation.There were no immediate reports of casualties in Lebanon.

* Lebanese security sources said they felt it was unlikely Lebanon’s Hezbollah guerrillas, against whom Israel waged a 2006 war, carried out the rocket strike. Israeli military affairs commentators said Hezbollah, which fired some 4,000 rockets into Israel in that conflict, had no interest in heating up the border and drawing punishing Israeli air strikes.

* Hamas sources in Lebanon denied involvement. Israeli commentators pointed a finger at Palestinian guerrilla groups in Lebanon, saying Israel had been expecting them to respond to the 13-day-old offensive that has killed more than 600 of their brethren in the Gaza Strip. Last week, the leader of the Damascus-based Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, Ahmed Jibril, threatened to open a new front on Israel.

*”We took into account there would be an attempt by Palestinian groups to express solidarity,” Israeli cabinet minister Shalom Simchon said after the rocket attack.

* “It appears this small flame has been extinguished,” Roni Daniel, military affairs correspondent for Israel’s Channel Two television reported after the northern border went quiet again following the rocket salvo and Israel’s shelling.

(Writing by Jeffrey Heller, Editing by Dominic Evans)

© Thomson Reuters 2009 All rights reserved.

addImpression(“1390732_Share Links”);


What do you tell your daughter?…

January 7, 2009
Leave a Comment

Texte ecrit par une blogeuse de Gaza, Laila, le 7 janvier 2009. Elle se presente elle-meme sur son blog A Mother from Gaza, Raising Yousuf and Noor

“I am a Palestinian from Gaza. I am a Muslim. I am a journalist. I am a mother. This blog is about the trials of raising my children between spaces and identities-Gaza, the US, Lebanon, Haifa, while working as a journalist”.


Another day, another massacre, more diplomatic deliberation, more silence, more complicity.

The invasion on Gaza has been mentally exhausting. I have tried my best to overcome this feeling of impotence by channeling the energy to action- though we may be powerless to change a government’s heinous actions on our own, together our voices rise far above, farther than we can ever imagine.

Last night we capped of our night with the latest hour of coverage on Aljazeera English, which was reporting on how the UN had made shelters out of its schools for those internally displaced.

“I am getting a bad feeling about this- I wouldn’t be surprised if this shelter was bombed” I told Yassine.

We woke up in the morning to the heart-rending news, as I rushed to make Noor’s pediatrician appointment on time, my mind not quite here.

I then appeared on Canadian Broadcasting live with my father.

“Is there anything you’d like to tell your daughter?” the anchor concluded by asking.

“What do I tell her? I honestly don’t know if I’ll live from one hour to the next,” my father replied. “She keeps asking me to describe the casualties for her that I’m seeing; but I can’t. What should I tell her? That I’ve seen bodies with my own eyes reduced to nothing more than pieces of black flesh?”

My father went on to describe accounts of Palestinians being used as human shields-by the Israelis. The Israeli military has been forcing families out of their homes and making them scope out buildings and rooms for the army to enter and for their snipers to nest in. It is a practice they have used before-in Rafah, where i personally reported on it during Operation Rainbow in 2004, in Jenin, and in Nablus in 2007 (where a young girl and boy were abused) . Btselem has said that “Israeli soldiers routinely used Palestinian civilians as human shields by forcing them to carry out life-threatening military tasks”, despite an Israeli High Court Order prohibiting the practice.

He went on to speak of the massacre at the UN school turned shelter, which had just occurred, reminding people that these same Palestinians in may cases by the Israeli army to leave their homes through robocalls and other forms of intimidation; then bombed in the only safe place they could find.

I asked if he had gone out at all- he said my mother has not left the house in days, but that they needed some tomatoes to cook supper with. “the stores are empty-there is very little on the shelves; and the Shanti bakery had something like 300 people waiting in line.”

Surprisingly, he said people are trying to go on with their lives. It is the mundane and ordinary that often save your sanity, help you live through the terror. It is no small thing to endure: knowing that both in deliberateness and scope, it is an unprecedented modern-day assault against an occupied, stateless people-most of them refugees.

How many more massacres until the human consciousness awakens?


Comment la TV russe couvre le conflit a Gaza

January 7, 2009
Leave a Comment

La video de la RT sur ce lien


Nasrallah: Hezbollah will make Lebanon war look like 'a walk in the park'

January 7, 2009
Leave a Comment

Paru dans Haaretz
By Yoav Stern, Haaretz Correspondent and The Associated Press

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah on Wednesday warned that should Israel attack Lebanon, it would suffer an even greater defeat than the one he claimed it suffered in 2006.
“We are prepared for every possibility and are ready for all aggression… The Zionists will discover that the war they had in July was a walk in the park if we compare it to what we’ve prepared for every new aggression,” Nasrallah said, referring to the Second Lebanon War.
The militant organization’s leader made the comments in a speech carried by Arab TV networks. He also said Israel would not be able to destroy Hamas, against which it is waging a ground offensive in Gaza.
Nasrallah also chastised Arab leaders for mediating a truce with Israel instead of siding with embattled Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
His remarks were a step-up in rhetoric – he has so far only verbally supported Hamas allies fighting Israeli troops in Gaza – that could stoke tension on Israel’s northern border.
Israel has warned Hezbollah against igniting a second front, saying it would retaliate massively.


L'opinion d'un israelien sur l'offensive sur Gaza

January 6, 2009
1 Comment

“Only” a person killed here or there, some badly injured. I myself often had a bad conscience when I encouraged that policy of restraint. Here I was living in safe Jerusalem abandoning the population in the south to their fate for years. These were not settlers in the occupied areas with whom I have little sympathy. These were Israelis like me.


Planning an invasion of Lebanon?

November 10, 2008
Leave a Comment

Source Middle East Times
Monday, November 10, 2008

Published: November 10, 2008
SYRIA’S HAND IN LEBANON — Most of the proof of Syria’s hand in Fatah al-Islam’s reign of terror emerged after the end of the 15-week war between the group and the Lebanese army at Nahr al-Bared refugee camp, in northern Lebanon, during the summer of 2007. (UPI photo shows Nahr al-Bared during Lebanese military bombardments in June 2007.)
One leader that could not wait for U.S. President George W. Bush to be out of office is Syrian President Bashar Assad. Assad profusely congratulated his favored candidate: Barack Obama. President-elect Obama should be careful in his dealings with the Syrian regime. In fact, quite possibly, Assad might be pondering if he could get away with reoccupying Lebanon.

The whole strategy of finding excuses to re-invade Lebanon is little by little being put in place. The most ominous signs were the deployment of 10,000 Syrian special forces on the northern border followed by the recent deployment of additional troops on the eastern border. Syria explained that it was to prevent Sunni Salafists terrorists from entering Syrian territory.

The third step took place on Thursday when Syrian state television broadcast “confessions” from members of the Islamist terror group Fatah al-Islam (FAI).

Not only did the FAI militants admit being behind a suicide bombing in Damascus in September but also Wafa al-Absi, the daughter of FAI’s leader Shaker al-Absi, stated that FAI got money from Saad Hariri’s anti-Syrian Future Movement.

By undermining the current Lebanese parliamentary majority, Syria is trying one way or another to regain control of what it still considers part of its territory.

Why is this so obvious?

FAI is first and foremost a creation of the Syrian intelligence service that has been used to destabilize the Lebanese regime that kicked out the Syrian occupation army in 2005.

Numerous experts describe FAI as a Syrian vehicle influenced also by al-Qaida. Indeed, al-Qaida, which uses the Palestinian camps in Lebanon as a transit point, definitely influenced FAI, whose ideology went from the “liberation of Palestine” to a worldwide jihad against the crusaders and the Jews.

In November 2006, Salafist militants of FAI infiltrated Lebanon through Heloua, a remote Lebanese village out of reach for the Lebanese army since it is considered a Syrian enclave. According to a Western military expert, Palestinians have been receiving light weapons from Syria, which is then redistributed to other refugee camps in Lebanon.

So FAI settled in the Palestinian camp of Nahr al-Bared, in the north of Lebanon. Hostile to their presence, Fatah leaders in the camp stated that FAI’s only contact was with Syria. That is just the tip of the iceberg: a slew of facts clearly link up FAI to its Syrian patron. The confessions of the FAI commando arrested for the February 2007 bombing of two commuter buses carrying Lebanese Christians are very explicit on Syria’s role.

But most of the proof of Syria’s hand in FAI’s reign of terror emerged after the end of the 15-week war between FAI and the Lebanese army at Nahr al-Bared during the summer of 2007. Ghazi Aridi, the former Lebanese information minister, revealed that “some of [FAI]‘s leaders were linked to Syrian security services.”

He added: “Lebanese intelligence and government seized many documents, films, recordings, all very compromising for Syrian intelligence. The confessions of the [Fatah al-Islam] terrorists [arrested during the Nahr al-Bared clashes] brought to light their links to some Syrian services, and the implication of the latter in the wave of explosions and attacks that have been rocking Lebanon for several years.”

Also General Ashraf Rifi, the general director of the Lebanese interior forces, affirmed that Lebanese authorities seized 90 kilos of biological material in the Nahr al-Bared camp belonging to FAI. That had to be provided by a regional power.

Finally, fighters from other pro-Syrian groups joined the FAI ranks and two of these groups, Fatah Intifada and PFLP-GC even delivered weapons to FAI. Lastly, just last month, the Lebanese army arrested five FAI members. But the leader of this cell, Abdel-Ghani Jawhar, allegedly fled to Syria just five minutes before the arrival of security forces.

In light of this, the “confessions” of the FAI members seem as an attempt by certain groups in Syria to link the recent terrorist attacks to Lebanon. Some analysts fear all this might be Damascus paving the way to a new Syrian intervention in Lebanon.

Olivier Guitta, an adjunct fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and a foreign affairs and counterterrorism consultant, is the founder of the newsletter The Croissant (www.thecroissant.com).


Report: Lebanon army wants U.S. heavy weapons

October 27, 2008
Leave a Comment
SOURCE ALBAWABA.com     Posted: 27-10-2008 , 10:15 GMT      

lebanon armyLebanese commanders are anxious about the slow pace of U.S. military support so far and say the army needs heavier weapons, the New York Times reported. “Of the $410 million that has been committed since 2006, less than half has been delivered — mostly ammunition, communications equipment, Humvees, trucks, rifles, automatic grenade launchers and other light weapons, and spare parts,” the newspaper quoted Lebanese and American military officials as saying.

 

“It is heavier weapons that are most needed,” Lebanese officials told the daily. “It is understandable, the frustration the Lebanese are expressing,” said Mark T. Kimmitt, assistant secretary of state for political and military affairs.

 

 


Lettre ouverte

July 30, 2008
Leave a Comment

Un grand merci a tous les responsables politiques qui se sont disputes des mois durant pour acceder a un poste ministeriel et qui aujoud’hui se revelent bien incapable de rediger un texte de quelques pages qu’un eleve de Premiere aurait boucle en 4 heures de temps. En esperant qu’ils ressentent par eux-meme assez de honte et d’embarras et qu’ils envisagent un jour de se justifier devant l’opinion publique. Mais il est tellement facile de rever…


Les casques bleus dénoncent la venue du président syrien à Paris

June 25, 2008
Leave a Comment

Laurent Attar-Bayrou, président de l’association internationale des soldats de la paix (Casques bleus) a jugé mercredi que la présence du président syrien Bachar al-Assad au défilé militaire du 14 juillet serait “un scandale, une atteinte à la mémoire” des soldats français tués en 1983 dans l’attentat du Drakkar au Liban. “Quand même, au Liban la France a perdu des hommes, les 58 parachutistes qui sont morts à Drakkar plus tous les morts pendant les années 80″, a déclaré sur France Inter M. Attar-Bayrou, qui faisait à l’époque partie du contingent français de Casques bleus au Liban. Affirmant que “clairement il a été déterminé que la Syrie était commanditaire, fournisseur en armes, en moyens du hezbollah”, il a souligné qu’il n’y avait “jamais eu de repentance de ce pays”. “Et maintenant nous allons donner les honneurs, faire défiler nos troupes devant le représentant de ce pays. C’est pour nous un scandale, une atteinte à la mémoire de ces jeunes et de ceux qui ont contribué au rayonnement de la France et à la paix au Liban”, a dénoncé M. Attar-Bayrou. Selon lui, “on demande de la morale, il faut déjà commencer par la respecter et respecter ceux qui ont servi au péril de leur vie”. Le 23 octobre 1983, 58 soldats français de la force multinationale d’interposition avait été tués, dans un attentat au camion piégé contre l’immeuble du poste français Drakkar. L’attentat avait été revendiqué par le Jihad islamique.


Next Page »
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.